With time running out on a Bush Administration that is itching for more war in the Middle East and more political control at home, a former Army intelligence and public affairs officer has a vital question for all Americans: Are this week's Al Qaeda news and secretive, suspicious government terror drills a set up for a new 9/11 5th anniversary attack, code-named 9/11-V?
UPDATE to RED ALERT 9/11/06 (NASA, Ft. Monroe and Houston)
By Captain Eric H. May
Last Sunday the Lone Star Iconoclast -- and other media worldwide -- carried my "RED ALERT 9/11/06 (Chicago, Detroit & Houston)." http://www.lonestaricon.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=484&z=59 The article warned of a Bush Administration fifth-anniversary 9/11 attack, code-named 9/11-V, to justify Big Brother government and an attack on Iran. Mr. Leon Smith, the Iconoclast editor in chief, and I have monitored developments since then, and agree that the danger of a 9/11-V attack seems even greater now than a week ago.
Bush Media & the Al Qaeda Script
Since Labor Day the media has blitzed us with terror, showing the official devil, Osama Bin Laden -- along with the official diabolical team, Al Qaeda. He praises the 19 hijacking terrorists officially blamed for the 9/11/01 attack, and the 19 are shown making pre-martyrdom statements with the flaming Twin Towers and Pentagon in the background. Other masked and menacing minions practice karate kicks and judo grapples as they go through rigorous training.
Even normally mum mainstream media joke that it seems Bin Laden works for George W. Bush. In the wake of the Bin Laden propaganda package, Bush has asked Congress to strengthen his powers against the judiciary and Constitution with specific regulation authorizing domestic spying and Gitmo torture -- all to protect the public, of course.
Bush and his media know that the more they terrorize us, the more willingly we shall accept a police state and a world war. The only thing that could make us even more willing would be another 9/11 attack. The new Bin Laden tapes reminds us of what the media constantly tells us: It isn't really a matter of IF, but a matter of WHEN.
A Deadly Duo: Ft. Monroe & NASA
A rapidly growing third of the public now believes that the Bush Administration staged the attacks of 9/11, and don't trust the government when it conducts terror practice. They correctly point out that on 9/11/01, US air defenses were running terror drills simulating aircraft crashing into US buildings; and on 7/7/05 London police were running terror drills simulating the bombings of their London trains. In both cases, the terror drills were used to set up the terror events.
On Wednesday, 9/6, the Virginia Beach News reported that Ft. Monroe, Virginia, will be conducting highly suspicious terror drills from Monday, 9/11, through Wednesday, 9/13. http://feeds.thevirginiabeachnews.net/?rid=6e2b997658195392&cat=622ebe3a790ef0e4&f=1 In the last year, two Ft. Monroe exercises, each simulating a Hiroshima-style Al Qaeda nuclear attack, have coincided with terror set-ups in the Houston Metro area.
To make things worse, NASA's space shuttle Atlantis lifted off on Saturday, 9/9, just ahead of the Ft. Monroe exercises. The launch of the shuttle allows the federal government to exercise national security controls -- especially in Houston, NASA's Space City -- that make it quite easy to set up a terror attack, or cover up the details afterward. NASA has sent the space shuttle into orbit two times since the Columbia catastrophe of three years ago, and both of those shuttle missions have coincided with terror set-ups in the Houston Metro area.
Ft. Monroe, NASA & Texas City: 7/28/05
Ft. Monroe was simulating a US Hiroshima and Discovery had been in orbit for two days on Thursday, 7/28/05. That afternoon in Texas City, just south of Houston, British Petroleum blew up. Hours later, after dark, hundreds of thousands of Houstonians looked south and saw a sight that created mass terror: a nuclear attack on Texas City -- or so they thought. My Houston police contacts and I discussed the explosion the next day and agreed that it was a one-hour eruption of energy that was intended to look like a nuke. We wondered whether it was a new kind of weapon on board the space shuttle. We placed the explosion either directly over Texas City or further south over the Gulf of Mexico. We believed it was originally to coincided with the Hiroshima nuke Ft. Monroe was setting up, and instead of being an officially suppressed event (as it is now), it would have been played a million times, the way the Twin Towers demolition has been played, to make the USA want to attack the Middle East.
Ft. Monroe, NASA & Texas City: 1/31/06
Ft. Monroe was simulating another US Hiroshima on 1/31/06, and we had been warning the citizens of Texas City that they were in great danger for two weeks previously. What sent us into red alert mode that time was NASA's launch of the New Horizon Pluto Mission -- a 9-year mission to the 9th planet, named after the god of death -- on 1/19. We believed the 1/19 date (a backwards 9/11) and death god theme comprised a "go code" for another attack, and events supported our analysis. As the Ft. Monroe exercises were running, Texas City residents, edgy because of our Internet alert, became terrified when Bush Administration nuclear forces turned up on the beaches south of the city, saying they were part of secret exercises.
NASA & Baytown: 7/2/06
This summer NASA originally scheduled its space shuttle Discovery launch for 7/1/06, and once again we were active in our public affairs effort to warn the public, especially in the Houston area. In previous weeks I had published a widely read article in the Iconoclast stating that the oil president and former Texas resident might set up his own home state, in the petro-cities of Southeast Texas. Again events bore out the analysis and prediction: One day after the scheduled Discovery launch, there was another set-up explosion of a refinery, this time in Baytown's Exxon Mobil.
Summing Up Serious Trouble
None of what I've written above is new to my readers. I wrote an overview of the ongoing danger in my 7/17/06 Lone Star Iconoclast article: "9/11, 3/11, 7/11 Terror Dates -- Is There a Code?" http://www.lonestaricon.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=318&z=44 The article contains mainstream and alternative links to validate my assertions of an official set ups of terror attempts, and official cover ups afterward.
The most frightening part of my red alert is the way the Pentagon, sworn to defend the American People, has reacted to it. After weeks of correspondence with command echelons of the Army, I sent it the red alert straight to them -- but they have been anything but straight in reply. A one-paragraph, unsigned reply from the Army Inspector General proves that our military leaders are quite aware that the American People are in grave danger, and quite intent on passing the buck and shirking their duty:
Captain May,
Perhaps you have the wrong agency. The Department of the Army is not responsible for addressing criminal matters. I recommend you revaluate (sic) your concerns and submit them to one of the agencies responsible for handling issues of this magnitude. I am certain you know who they are. I am sorry we could not be more helpful regarding your efforts. [Unsigned]
It's hard to read such a reply without remembering that the Pentagon closed its eyes and ears when loyal American officers warned of an imminent Japanese attack against Pearl Harbor 65 years ago. Historians have suggested that the Pentagon did so because it wanted a Pearl Harbor attack to mobilize the nation for World War Two. Do they now want a 9/11-V attack to mobilize us for World War Three?
# # #
Captain Eric H. May is the founder and commander of Ghost Troop, the 300-strong 911 Truth Movement's cyber-cavalry unit, made up of of military and police veterans, along with citizen researchers and activists. His most recent interview and Iconoclast articles are available via Visibility 9-11.
Captain Eric H. May captainmay@prodigy.net www.ghosttroop.net Houston, Texas